Junior hockey programs have a way of treating college commitments like a badge of honor to influence the decision process of young hockey players.
The truth about college commitments is very simple.
Anything before their senior year in high school is a Verbal Commitment. What does that mean? Exactly. Before anything is signed, either the player or school can walk away from their original agreement, leaving a player or coach in a bad position.
There is a Detroit area player who received a college commitment from one of the eastern schools back when he was sixteen, and the new coach at the school did not honor it. The player was rated high as a young prospect and even drafted into the USHL, where he played for years. However, he never really developed into the player the college was hoping he would, so they understandingly did not honor the commitment.
Was this wrong? Personally I think the system is wrong. Hockey is one of the few sports where players leave home to play junior hockey for a few years with the purpose of development before entering college. In most cases all the college freshmen are not true freshmen by age. These players usually range from 19-21 years old, and have played a few years, or more, at the junior hockey level.
Most junior teams and leagues use college commitments as an advertising tool to proclaim the success of their programs. How many of those players actually played for that school? Should a player that never actually played a game for THAT team be listed as a commitment on the junior team’s website? Should a coach be allowed to take his commitment list with him from coaching job to coaching job? It may sound funny, but we see it all the time. We know one junior coach that used his short term employment as a college coach, back in the 70’s, as the basis for his entire junior program for years.
Junior hockey leagues and the NCAA should work together to protect the integrity of the recruiting process. The baloney verbal commitments should be eliminated. Force each college to actually sign the player for whatever deal they are willing to offer at the correct age they are allowed. This will help eliminate us seeing fifteen and sixteen year olds committed to colleges that they may never play for.
If they cannot commit to players, until they are in their senior year, then maybe the junior teams won’t be going after younger and younger players. The NCAA does a great job with everything they do to give the student athlete an exceptional college experience. This is one area that we believe is misleading to parents and players. Schools should have to stand behind their end of the commitment and they do most of the time.
The system is so weighted towards the universities it's become a joke. Players are recruited, enrolled, and are locked in when the coach can jump at any moment with no repercussions.
Like junior players, college athletes should have the ability to freely transfer, without penalty, in the event the coach leaves or the school fails to maintain their end of the deal.
At the same time, if a player decides to leave school, for major junior or professional hockey, before the end of his agreement he should be on the hook for every dime the college invested in him (or her). That rule should apply to the entire spectrum of NCAA Division I sports.
That's just my opinion, I'd like to see yours. Feel free to comment below!
* Disclaimer: This site may contain advice, opinions and statements from various authors and information providers. Views expressed in this article reflect the personal opinion of the author, Stephen Heisler, and not necessarily the views of JuniorHockey.com. JuniorHockey.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other info provided in the article, or from any other member of this site.