Junior Hockey Video Evaluation System


Submit an Article to JuniorHockey.com »




Blizzard to relocate to Brookings, South Dakota for 2012-13 season - Junior Hockey News


Tweet This
Published: Monday, 23 Apr 2012
By: NAHL Communications

The North American Hockey League (NAHL) has announced that its Board of Governors has approved the relocation of the Alexandria Blizzard from Alexandria, Minnesota to Brookings, South Dakota. Once the move to Brookings is complete, the team shall be renamed the Brookings Blizzard and compete in the NAHL's Central Division during the upcoming 2012-13 season. The NAHL is the oldest and largest junior hockey league in the United States, with 28 teams representing 14 states.

The Brookings Blizzard will play their home games out of the Larson Ice Center, which is a two-rink facility that is owned and operated by the City of Brookings. The facility was newly constructed and finished in the Spring of 2002, which include several renovations, some completed as recently as the Fall of 2009. The Larson Ice Center has a seating capacity of approximately 2,000 in the main rink and 600 in the second rink. The facility is also fully outfitted with large heated viewing areas, upper and lower level lobbies and an upper level concession area as well.

"Chris and Mitri Canavati have been fantastic and committed owners in our league for over seven years in the Alexandria market and the relocation of the Blizzard NAHL franchise to Brookings allows them the best opportunity for success with the NAHL financial model," said NAHL Commissioner Mark Frankenfeld. "The Brookings, South Dakota market fits nicely into our Central Division footprint and is an exciting addition to our league, given our already-strong presence in the Dakota's and the community's passion and support for hockey."

In addition to the NAHL team moving to Brookings, Chris Canavati also announced that he would be keeping a team in Alexandria, Minnesota to play as the Alexandria Blizzard in the North American 3 Hockey League (3HL), an 18-team, USA Hockey Tier III-sanctioned junior league that is run by the NAHL.

"It was a hard decision to move the NAHL team, but it came to the point where we felt it would be better suited in a different market," Canavati said. "But, just like Brookings may be a better fit for the NAHL team, the Alexandria area better supports a team in the 3HL than it does in the NAHL. The 3HL's West Division has a more conducive footprint with four other teams in the state of Minnesota and one in Northern Iowa."

The Brookings Blizzard will retain the services of current Alexandria head coach Doc DelCastillo, who called it the next step for this organization after spending the last three years in Alexandria. "It's an entertaining brand of hockey. We'll get up and down the ice and we'll play physical. This is going to be a tough ticket to get," said DelCastillo. "Once we start playing, it's going to be tough to get in here and I would tell [the fans] to get season tickets to make sure they have a seat. We're providing more young men an opportunity to play at a higher level and that really excites us."

"We are hopeful that both the Brookings and Alexandria communities will be behind us," Canavati said. "It's still going to be good hockey at both levels. The fans in Brookings are going to see a team that has set franchise records for wins each of the last three seasons and we're going to put on a great show for the fans, who we know will love the NAHL brand of hockey. However, our standards and expectations in Alexandria don't change just because we're going to Tier III, and we don't want the fans to expect a different experience because it still will be a lot of fun and great hockey to watch."

A presentation to and final approval by the USA Hockey junior council is expected no later than June 9th.






Discuss:

posted Apr. 24th, 2012 - 4:19pm
David Saint-Onge says:
Congratulations to Chris. During my tenure in the NAHL, I always found Chris to be honest and professional. I trust he needs to make this change for the good of his organization.

It does, however, magnify a significant operating limitation of the league that is the underlying reason you always see a tsunami of off-season changes to the structure and process of the NAHL. In the simplest of terms, the business model of the NAHL does not work. There are certainly a few exceptions, but not many. It is extremely difficult to meet the demands of USAH and the financial obligations set forth by the league in how it wants to market and brand itself. Parents, communities, and the media should never be surprised at what happens in the league. I met some great people there with the very best of intentions who ran their teams honorably. But in the end, you are always chasing the money because of the expense of the business model.

posted Apr. 24th, 2012 - 5:18pm
Stephen Heisler says:
David,
The issue is not about the model, it is more about the pipedream that is sold to the unsuspecting markets.

The Tier II criteria does work well enough in Fairbanks and Kenai River. It works well in Wenatchee and the entire south division outside of NM. It will be extremely successful in Johnstown and it has been in Fresno.

Like a lot about life, the return depends on the effort and investment.

I believe that Chicago could have been a gold mine. Instead the operator treated the market like a piggy bank. If somebody went into that market with a seven figure budget, he would be able to come out of it with a competitive profit.

It is the very small markets that have a difficult time sustaining the operation. The blame there falls back on the individual that pushed the concept down their throats.

Alexandria should have been a Minnesota Junior Hockey League all along, the same goes for Albert Lea, Owatonna, North Iowa, and the others. The NA3HL went in there only to give their weaker operators a way out that saves face.

posted Apr. 24th, 2012 - 5:49pm
Randy Russon says:
Correct me if I am wrong but is anyone forcing anyone to join the NAHL? Those who "sign up" for the NAHL should know exactly what they are getting into beforehand, methinks. Seems as though owners who could not/did not make a go of it in any league, in this case the NAHL, take to casting the blame for their shortfalls elsewhere. If David Saint-Onge was "misled" in any way by the NAHL, then let us know how. To me, if due process is done, there should be no reason to cast the blame elsewhere for one's failures.

posted Apr. 24th, 2012 - 8:24pm
Stephen Heisler says:
Randy,
A reasonable amount of reality is expected in the presentation. If the business plan is expected to raise $350,000 and the commissioner approves it, there is a strong likelihood that the new owner is going to come up $150,000 short.

The reality has to be in the expectations. The rest of the league owners should tell the new guys that $350,000 is just not going to cut it. Realistic sales goals should be set and reachable. Some of these operators go into markets with a pie-in-sky hope that they are going to sell out all available properties and average 5,000 fans a game at the full ticket-price.

What they don't tell them is to get ready for a ton of three-games series' against the same opponent. The true cost of equipment and the rate the league approved supplier is forcing you to pay. Same goes for the rate at the official hotel you will be forced to stay at.

Operators quickly discover that the best way to end up as a millionaire involved in junior hockey is to start out as a billionaire.

There is a really good reason that the Tier II criteria calls for a net worth of $2.5M in liquid assets, because it just may take that much room to really make a team work.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 7:20am
Randy Russon says:
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.


posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 7:56am
Stephen Heisler says:
The problem is not the water, its the kool-ade.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 8:40am
Randy Russon says:
It's still a matter of choice.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 10:47am
Mike Cline says:
They really need to do their due diligence and check into the market. Any business savy potential owner should talk to current owners, as well as former owners and get a realistic idea what they are looking at. While some teams can run on a shoe string budget some teams can't.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 12:10pm
Randy Russon says:
I do know that before Soo Eagles owner Ron Lavin purchased the Traverse City North Stars franchise he did exhaustive due diligence on the NAHL before making his decision. Ron's a smart, successful businessman who knows exactly what he is getting into joining the NAHL. His judgement is unquestionable.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 1:27pm
Stephen Heisler says:
Randy,
I trust that Lavin did the right thing...I was referring to the 15 or so teams that either quit playing or moved in the last five years.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 1:36pm
Randy Russon says:
Stephen,

You do have a point. Relocation is rather high.

A question though: why did NAHL governors extend the commissioner's contract if the NAHL model is not working?

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 1:43pm
Stephen Heisler says:
That is the easy one... because he makes them lots of money.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 1:44pm
David Saint-Onge says:
Gentlemen, I merely rendered an opinion based on pertinent experience. No ill will, no sour grapes.

Due diligence is necessary, but when the demands of the league change, and change at a pace that is not economically viable no matter how much due diligence you did when you acquired the team, it is almost impossible to survive. Those that do are either in a market that works at higher price points, or they are afforded access to coffers other teams do not have. The point about needing $2.5 million of liquid assets to simply 'make a team work' is exactly my point. The massive amount of team turnover and relocation is directly related to the operational demands put on these teams. Being forced to travel, being forced to attend events that do not add value to your team but line the coffers of a select few, are pertinent examples of how due diligence inevitably fails. Everyone who enters the league has the best of intentions. I have met a great many people who are good businessmen but quickly discovered that unwritten mandates and excessive spending is not the recipe for success. If I wasn't somewhere on the right track, you wouldn't be writing about how kids are taken advantage of and how some owners might be less than honorable. Everyone has to chase the almighty dollar if they want to survive in this model.

posted Apr. 25th, 2012 - 2:03pm
Randy Russon says:
David,

I wasn't questioning you at all, please know that. I was only wondering, while asking a question or two. I know that most junior hockey owners get into it for a love or passion for the game.

Regards,

RR

Log in to post a comment

Log in with your Facebook account.
No registration required!:




Don't have a Facebook account?

Log in with your JuniorHockey.com account »

New visitors: Click here to create your JuniorHockey.com account »

( we'll bring you back here when you're finished! )







* Article disclaimer: This site may contain advice, opinions and statements from various authors and information providers. Views expressed in this article reflect the personal opinion of the author, NAHL Communications, and not necessarily the views of JuniorHockey.com. JuniorHockey.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other info provided in the article, or from any other member of this site.





About Us   |   Privacy   |   TOS   |   Copyright Policy   |   Advertise   |   Contact
Junior Hockey .com
562 Kingwood Dr, Ste 3, Kingwood, TX 77339
Sales Phone: (281) 973-2050
© 2013  JuniorHockey.com - All rights reserved.
Covering news for US Junior Hockey & Canadian Junior Hockey

View JuniorHockey.com Stats